Skip to main content

SQL Quirks - count and sum

I was reminded of a little quirk of SQL recently, and I thought I would share it with my readers. I will be going over the SQL in a manner suitable for beginners, but the quirk that I refer to could catch an intermediate student of SQL. I will use some simple SQL to illustrate my point.

-- 1. create temporary table
CREATE TABLE #test1
(
id int not null ,
name varchar(50) not null
) ;

-- 2. declare variables
DECLARE @cnt int, @sum int ;

-- 3. compute statistics
SELECT @cnt = count(*) FROM #test1 ;
SELECT @sum = sum(id) FROM #test1 ;

-- 4. print results to query analyzer
PRINT '@cnt = ' + ISNULL( CONVERT(varchar, @cnt), '[NULL]') ;
PRINT '@sum = ' + ISNULL( CONVERT(varchar, @sum), '[NULL]') ;

-- 5. cleanup
DROP TABLE #test1 ;
If you will paste this sequence into query analyzer, and run it in a non-production database, you will see that it produces:

@cnt = 0
@sum = [NULL]

In step 1, we create an empty table. In step 2, we declare two variables, and their initial value is NULL. Step 3 should assign a value to both variables, BUT since there are no records, @cnt receives a value of ZERO, while @sum is set to NULL. This is counter-intuitive for me, but "it is what it is". Since the statement "SELECT @variable=value FROM thetable;" doesn't assign a value consistently, I like to add a statement like "SET @variable = INIT_VALUE;" or "SELECT @cnt = 0, @sum = 0 ;" first. As an exercise, try min and max statements. Try inserting 1 record between steps 2 and 3, and doing a SELECT ... WHERE id = -1; (a wrong value).

By the way, you will notice that I add a space, then a semicolon at the end of each statement. I do this for two reasons: 1) it helps me to catch mistakes which might otherwise be hidden; 2) a former co-worker had minor vision problems and told me that it was easier to see the semicolon if it was separated from the last word by one space (Hi, Carolyn!).

Popular posts from this blog

Castle ActiveRecord with DetachedCriteria

My current development environment is Visual Studio Express C# Edition (read that as free ), Castle ActiveRecord's latest svn trunk(usually within a few days), and NHibernate svn trunk. As of NHibernate version 1.2.0, there is a very cool new class out there ... DetachedCriteria. This class lets you set all of your Castle relational attributes like BelongsTo, HasMany, etc. as lazy fetch, and over-ride this for searches, reports, or anytime you know ahead of time that you will be touching the related classes by calling detachedCriteria.SetFetchMode(..., FetchEnum.Eager). As a good netizen, I have tried to contribute to NHibernate and Castle ActiveRecord even if only in the smallest of ways . Oh yeah, I tried mapping to a SQL VIEW, and it worked GREAT! I received a comment after my last post, indicating that there is a better way, and I am sure of it, but the view guaranteed that I only have one database request for my dataset. NHibernate was wanting to re-fetch my missing as

Castle ActiveRecord calling a Stored Procedure

Update: I have contributed patch AR-156 that allows full integration of Insert, Update and Delete to ActiveRecord models . If you've been reading my blog lately, you know that I have been seriously testing the Castle ActiveRecord framework out. I really love it, but I have an existing Microsoft SQL Server database with many stored procedures in it. I have tested the ActiveRecord model out, and I am sure that I will learn enough to be able to use it for standard CRUD (create, read, update, delete aka. insert, select, update, delete) functionality. BUT ... If I really want to integrate with my existing billing procedures, etc, I will have to be able to call stored procedures. I have taken two approaches ... write the ARHelper.ExecuteNonQuery(targetType, dmlString) method that gets a connection for the supplied type, executes dmlString, and closes it. write the ARHelper.RegisterCustomMapping(targetType, xmlString) method that allows me to add mappings that refer to my auto-gener

Castle ActiveRecord with Criteria and Alias

Update May 25, 2007: ActiveRecord now supports DetachedCriteria, which eliminates the need for the SlicedFindAll that I wrote below. It is nice when a library moves to add support for such commonly needed functions. So in summary, use Detached criteria instead of the code below. It is still a nice example of using NHibernate sessions. I have a history log, where each history record "belongs to" a service record. I have to treat this as a child-to-parent join, since some children are orphans. I wanted to use the FindAll(Criteria), but I wanted the option to have optional criteria, orders and aliases. My solution was to create an ARAlias class to represent an Associated Entity and an alias, and then build an ARBusinessBase class with the following method: public static T[] SlicedFindAll(int firstResult, int maxResults, Order[] orders, ARAlias[] aliases, params ICriterion[] criteria) { IList list = null; ISessionFactoryHolder holder = ActiveRecordMediator.GetSessionF