Skip to main content

Castle ActiveRecord calling a Stored Procedure

Update: I have contributed patch AR-156 that allows full integration of Insert, Update and Delete to ActiveRecord models.

If you've been reading my blog lately, you know that I have been seriously testing the Castle ActiveRecord framework out. I really love it, but I have an existing Microsoft SQL Server database with many stored procedures in it. I have tested the ActiveRecord model out, and I am sure that I will learn enough to be able to use it for standard CRUD (create, read, update, delete aka. insert, select, update, delete) functionality. BUT ... If I really want to integrate with my existing billing
procedures, etc, I will have to be able to call stored procedures. I have taken
two approaches ...
  1. write the ARHelper.ExecuteNonQuery(targetType, dmlString) method that gets a connection for the supplied type, executes dmlString, and closes it.

  2. write the ARHelper.RegisterCustomMapping(targetType, xmlString) method that allows me to add mappings that refer to my auto-generated Castle objects. Otherwise, the sql query or procedure would have to return scalars.

Any sql-query registered with the RegisterCustomMapping method below MUST return something, according to the documentation (I use Hibernate v3 documentation alot, and check NHibernate when things do not work). For calls that do not return anything (other than a count of records affected), look at my ExecuteNonQuery method.


SAMPLE USAGE CODE
Type targetType = typeof(Status);
string customMap = "<sql-query> ...";
ARHelper.RegisterCustomMapping(targetType, customMap);
ISessionFactoryHolder holder = ActiveRecordMediator.GetSessionFactoryHolder();
ISession sess = holder.CreateSession(targetType);
try
{
string sqlProc = "Test_ActivationStatus_SP";
IQuery query = sess.GetNamedQuery(sqlProc);
IList list = (IList)query.List();

foreach (object obj in list)
{
Debug.WriteLine(String.Format("{0}", obj.ToString()));
}
}
finally
{
holder.ReleaseSession(sess);
}



LIBRARY CODE
using Castle.ActiveRecord;
using Castle.ActiveRecord.Framework;
using Castle.ActiveRecord.Framework.Config;

using NHibernate;
using NHibernate.Cfg;
using NHibernate.Expression;

... namespace and class declarations go here ...

// returns number of records affected
protected internal static int ExecuteNonQuery(Type targetType, string dml)
{
ISessionFactoryHolder holder = ActiveRecordMediator.GetSessionFactoryHolder();
NHibernate.ISession session = holder.CreateSession(targetType);
int rowsAffected = -1;
IDbConnection conn = null;
IDbCommand cmd = null;

try
{
conn = session.Connection;
cmd = conn.CreateCommand();
cmd.CommandText = dml;
cmd.CommandType = CommandType.Text;
rowsAffected = cmd.ExecuteNonQuery();
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
throw new ActiveRecordException("Could not perform ExecuteNonQuery for "
+ targetType.Name, ex);
}
finally
{
if (cmd != null) cmd.Dispose();
holder.ReleaseSession(session);
}

//TODO: assert statement contains "INSERT", "UPDATE" or "EXEC"
return rowsAffected;
}

/*
* Sample Custom Mapping to call a stored procedure ...
* "<sql-query name='Test_Status_SP'>" +
* "<return class='Status'/>" +
* //"select * from dbo.LStatus" +
* "EXEC dbo.MyApp_Get_KeyValue 'dbo.LStatus', 0, 0" +
* "</sql-query>*/
public static void RegisterCustomMapping(
Type targetType,
string mapping_hbm_xml
)
{
ISessionFactoryHolder holder = ActiveRecordMediator.GetSessionFactoryHolder();
Configuration config = holder.GetConfiguration(holder.GetRootType(targetType));

// auto-build <hibernate-mapping> wrapper element,
// so user does not need to maintain this
mapping_hbm_xml = "<hibernate-mapping xmlns='"
+ Configuration.MappingSchemaXMLNS + "'"
+ " assembly='" + targetType.Assembly.FullName + "'"
+ " namespace='" + targetType.Namespace + "'>\n" + mapping_hbm_xml
+ "\n</hibernate-mapping>";

config.AddXmlString(mapping_hbm_xml);
}

Comments

kvieres said…
cant this method work with Oracle?
Roy Tate said…
I do not see any reason why this solution would be limited to Microsoft SQL Server. This patch was never accepted by the Castle developers. In another patch, I hacked support for ActiveRecord objects that called stored procedures for Add, Update and Delete methods, but it required a hack to NHibernate, since they don't expose a clean parameter list.

Popular posts from this blog

Castle ActiveRecord with DetachedCriteria

My current development environment is Visual Studio Express C# Edition (read that as free ), Castle ActiveRecord's latest svn trunk(usually within a few days), and NHibernate svn trunk. As of NHibernate version 1.2.0, there is a very cool new class out there ... DetachedCriteria. This class lets you set all of your Castle relational attributes like BelongsTo, HasMany, etc. as lazy fetch, and over-ride this for searches, reports, or anytime you know ahead of time that you will be touching the related classes by calling detachedCriteria.SetFetchMode(..., FetchEnum.Eager). As a good netizen, I have tried to contribute to NHibernate and Castle ActiveRecord even if only in the smallest of ways . Oh yeah, I tried mapping to a SQL VIEW, and it worked GREAT! I received a comment after my last post, indicating that there is a better way, and I am sure of it, but the view guaranteed that I only have one database request for my dataset. NHibernate was wanting to re-fetch my missing as

Castle Active Record Code Generator

I have finally released my Code Generator to Google Code as Active-Record-Gen . What does it generate? It generates ActiveRecord classes mainly, but I have used it to generate stored procedures and sys-admin scripts as well. This code generator does not (yet) generate a full Windows application project or a Mono-Rail web site, but the generated code could be used in either. In fact, with a few tweaks, this could be used to generate NHibernate "poco" and .xbm files. If you want to know more, look at the screen shots above, or head over to Google Code and run it. In my haste to make my first EXE release before supper, I forgot to add the Template directory, which should be at the same directory level as the EXE and config files. I just (1.5 hours later) uploaded a new EXE, but 2 people have already downloaded the EXE (not the source though). As for the basic table object, it is built with the following assumptions: Table name is plural, class name is singular. Field &quo